Tagged: recession RSS

  • Jakub Pawlowicz 2:56 pm on October 14, 2008 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , iceland, investment, recession   

    Thoughts about investment banks 

    I found a really good joke in one of today’s newspapers. It goes like this:
    “What is it: 12 chairmans of investment banks lying at the bottom of the sea? A good start.”

    Little Monty Pythonish, but it clearly shows what people think about banks. Banks that misapplied people trust and earned money in risky businesses, which, in my opinion, was doing something very inappropriate and immoral. 

    Yes, immoral. Sure, the governments may have prevented this situation by forcing banks to follow “good business” rules, but they didn’t. So what is the morality of banks’ chairmans as they allowed this situation to happen? Looks like there is none. They don’t feel responsible for causing the crisis but they actually shed responsibility to people taking credits. But they are so wrong. Who’s business it was to earn money? It was banks’ business. They did it by persuading people the can owe another credit, effectively overheating the market. This is their responsibility and they should pay for it.

    Take a look at Iceland. Bankers invested people money outside the country in very risky interests, effectively dismantling economy of the 8th richest nation in the world. Stock has been closed for over a week, people savings and investments are frozen, and government falling apart. I hope bank bosses will get fired soon without any bonuses paid, or even will go to jail for “frauds”. This should be a “sentence” for risking other people’s money, for forcing us to pay for their mistakes.

    What do you think about it?

     
  • Jakub Pawlowicz 12:36 pm on October 2, 2008 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: bush, plan demystified, recession, rescue plan, stock exchange, us senate, usa, wall street   

    US help plan demystified? 

    First of all, it’s my speculation only.

    1. On Saturday president Bush presented a plan to donate $700 billion dollars to the US market;
    2. On Monday US House of Representatives voted down the plan, stock exchange indexes took a deep dive; (some) investors lost a lot of money;
    3. On Tuesday president Bush presented another “refined” plan;
    4. On Wednesday the House of Representatives US senate backed the plan;
    5. Stock indexes will go up (at least for a moment), investors will need to rebuild their wallets;

    My question is why president Bush presented 2 plans?! Doesn’t he have his people in the House of Representatives, who should tell him: “Look George, make it better or we turn it down!”. 

    I think it may have been well planned by someone, who knew the first plan would be rejected. Sell shares before Monday, buy them on Tuesday, and you just got richer. I am asking this, because it is not clear. And if nobody knows what something is all about, it is probably about money.

    PS) I’ve just realized it hasn’t been backed by House of Representatives yet. But let’s wait till Friday.

    PPS) As supposed House of Representatives backed the plan on Friday. Anyone surprised?

     
  • Jakub Pawlowicz 10:55 pm on October 1, 2008 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: economical, learning, recession, spending less, wise   

    Learn to spend wisely 

    Recession. A very popular topic these days. Even in Poland, despite quite good growth rate, there are signals of slowing down. In US and western Europe it has started a few months/years ago, because of delays in mortgage payments, banks investing in risky stuff, people’s wallets depending more and more on credits and so on.

    Due to the recession, it’s a good time to consider spending less. But it’s a wrong assumption! It’s always good time to speak about spending more wisely! No matter what’s the situation on the market we should always tend towards a balance between what’s earned and spend. Why? As human beings easily adapt to propitious environment (that’s why we gain weight easily, and loose it not that easy!), once the good time ends, it’s simply very tough to adjust to the harder conditions, be it less money, more responsibility, or further way to work. Thus it’s wiser to ‘pre-adapt’. 

    A solution is to always leave a reserve: to spend less than you earn, to be more responsible than you meant to be (it always pays off!), drive economically even if you can afford for extra gas, or don’t buy 6th pair of jeans if you already have 5 in your wardrobe, and only one worn at the moment. Treat yourself like an investment and your wallet as investor’s one. No one wants to overspend. Try it and you’ll sleep better.

    Let me know what do you think about it. It works for me. It should for you too.

     
c
compose new post
j
next post/next comment
k
previous post/previous comment
r
reply
e
edit
o
show/hide comments
t
go to top
l
go to login
h
show/hide help
esc
cancel